Find your members. Roles and responsibilities. Members of the Assembly. The Speaker and office holders. Ethics and accountability. Get involved. Contact a member. Start or sign a Petition.
Participate in public inquiries. Work for us. Organise an event. Watch proceedings. Visit and learn. Visit Art collection. Home Visit and learn Resources Year 4 The role and importance of rules and laws. The role and importance of rules and laws Unit information Inquiry: What is the difference between rules and laws and why are they important?
Unit length: Two 2 lessons Learning objectives: Students will be able to confidently identify the difference between a rule and a law, why laws are important, and how laws can affect their lives.
Click on any of the lesson titles below to expand each lesson plan. Lesson one: Rules and laws Lesson information Learning objective: By the end of the lesson the students will have identified the difference between a rule and a law. Lesson orientation Teacher led class discussion: Imagine you are a friend of Chloe Crumb and you are going to visit her house for a weekend in the holidays, have a look at the rules for the Crumb household resource one.
Class discussion about some of the rules the students experience in their own homes. Teacher to record the examples of where you find rules provided by the students. What do students think a rule is? How is a rule different to a law? What do students think a law is? Look at the list of where do we find rules on the board, can students identify where laws might apply in any of these places e. Lesson reflection Can the students come up with a definition for a rule and a law?
What is a rule? Made by a group, affects people only in that group eg. Rules are neither created nor applied in a vacuum, on the other hand they created and used time and again for a purpose. Rules are intended to move us in a certain direction that we assume is good, or prohibit movement in direction that we believe is bad. The social rules are made by the members of the society.
Disobedience of the social rules is followed by punishment of social disapproval. There is no positive penalty associated with the violation of rules except excommunication or ostracism. On the other hand, law is enforced by the state. The objective of law is to bring order in the society so the members of society can progress and develop with some sort of security regarding the future. The state makes laws. Disobedience of state laws invites penalty, which is enforced by the government by the power of the state.
What is not enforceable is not Law. Law is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behaviour, wherever possible. It shapes politics, economics and society in numerous ways and serves as a social mediator of relations between people.
If the harm is criminalized in legislation, criminal law offers means by which the state can prosecute the perpetrator. Constitutional law provides a framework for the creation of law, the protection of human rights and the election of political representatives.
Administrative law is used to review the decisions of government agencies, while international law governs affairs between sovereign states in activities ranging from trade to environmental regulation or military action. The legal response to a given social or technological problem is therefore in itself a major social action which may aggravate a given problem or alleviate and help to solve it.
WordPress SEO. Skip to content Skip to footer. Articles Read to Know. A police officer may issue a speeding ticket to one driver, but not to another driver who committed the same offence. The Rule of Law, however, does not necessarily require that all people be treated identically. Instead, the Rule of Law simply requires that the law give the same considerations or apply the same standards to persons in similar circumstances.
The result of the application of those considerations or standards may differ significantly depending on the case. So, two people who have committed murder may receive different penalties if one person is a serial killer and the other is not. Similarly, a person injured in a car accident may receive more compensation than another person who suffered similar injuries if the first individual was blameless in the accident and the second individual somehow contributed to the accident. A police officer can properly decide to issue a warning rather than a ticket to one speeder and to issue a ticket to another speeder if the officer has reasonable grounds to think that the first speeder only needs a warning as a deterrent and the second speeder needs a ticket to learn his lesson.
In all of these circumstances, however, the Rule of Law remains at play because the difference in treatment depends on established criteria and not on the whims of the person administering the system. The fact that the Rule of Law is intrinsic to our society is demonstrated by the discomfort we feel when confronted with legal systems which operate without the Rule of Law, as with the examples noted at the start of this article.
Duplessis , , meaning that the Rule of Law forms part of the supreme law of our country, binding on all levels of government and enforceable by the courts. Apart from the fact that our constitution expressly recognizes or refers to the Rule of Law, the Supreme Court of Canada has also suggested that the very existence of our constitution implicitly demonstrates our respect for the Rule of Law because a constitution is by nature intended to be a supreme, objective law which describes the expected social order and which both governments and citizens must follow.
The founders of this nation must have intended, as one of the basic principles of nation building, that Canada be a society of legal order and normative structure: one governed by rule of law. While this is not set out in a specific provision, the principle of the rule of law is clearly a principle of our Constitution. On the contrary, like all other legal principles, the Rule of Law is sometimes violated—either intentionally or unintentionally, directly or indirectly, and in a myriad of different ways.
So, while we can and should take for granted the important role that the Rule of Law plays in our society, we cannot and should not necessarily assume that the Rule of Law will always be followed by our law-makers.
As with all other legal principles, we have to look to the courts to ensure that the Rule of Law is enforced. To date, Canadian courts have played a very active role in maintaining and enforcing the Rule of Law. The courts have referred to, defined, and applied the Rule of Law in many cases.
Duplessis and the Reference re Secession of the Province of Quebec. Although these decisions were made years apart, both cases demonstrate the importance which Canadian courts place on the Rule of Law and the essential service the courts provide in ensuring that our law-makers respect this Rule.
In Roncarelli v. In essence, Premier Duplessis was trying to indirectly discourage Roncarelli from posting bail for his friends.
The liquor licence could only properly be revoked if the cancellation was authorized by a particular statute or law. The Quebec statute which dealt with liquor licensing gave the power to issue or cancel liquor licences exclusively to another Quebec official and not to the Premier.
0コメント